Hi Mike,
I am glad you are still following up with Bitnodes. The recent spike in
nodes count should probably be taken with a grain of salt; run #231 (
http://getaddr.bitnodes.io/231/) does appear artificial to me, i.e.
potentially bogus nodes being added. I am still working on a more in depth
Trying something new... a [simple] patch sent to the list, for
discussion. Seems unlikely to be controversial. github access is
temporarily disabled, so this is the best pull request avenue for the
moment.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
Whitelist nodes against banning.
Is there a reason not to have a parallel get rpc to get the current list?
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason not to have a parallel get rpc to get the current list?
Easy enough to add. There had also been requests for an IP blacklist,
which would need associated RPC/config gadgetry.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin
Thanks a lot! I will run these patches on some nodes tomorrow to see if
it works.
On 22-11-13 21:49, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Whitelist nodes against banning.
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software
Wrong patch? This looks like node.js code for something called txtool.
--
Michael
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
Trying something new... a [simple] patch sent to the list, for
discussion. Seems unlikely to be controversial. github access is
6 matches
Mail list logo
