Hello all,
A while ago after discussion on the mailing list a repository was set up to
store the BIP documents, as this is deemed a more secure solution than
having them on the wiki:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
To prevent confusion the next step should probably be to replace the BIPs
on the
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:37:10 PM Wladimir wrote:
Hello all,
A while ago after discussion on the mailing list a repository was set up to
store the BIP documents, as this is deemed a more secure solution than
having them on the wiki:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
To prevent
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:37:10 PM Wladimir wrote:
I think this would stifle active BIP draft editing. We're already having a
hard time getting some developers to write BIPs for their proposals - I
don't
think we should
This entire discussion is recycled. Please review the previous
discussion, before asking the same questions over again.
Properly done, there are FEWER hurdles. In the previous discussion,
there was outlined a process whereby the BIPS Editor would receive an
email, and could take it from there.
Personally, I would be more inclined to submit and work on a BIP if it was
in GitHub. It's a regular home from home for me now.
On 5 December 2013 14:43, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
This entire discussion is recycled. Please review the previous
discussion, before asking the same
I know we should all be brainstorming and working on a new fee market.
But fact is, it will still take some time and in the meantime users will
continue to shout insults at us for the high fixed fee of 0,1 mBtc.
Even banks sometimes have less fees. (1 of 5 Play Store reviews of
Mycelium seem to
0.8.6 release candidate 1 is available from:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.8.6/test/
Please help sanity-test, especially if you are running OSX or Windows.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--
7 matches
Mail list logo
