On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport bendavenp...@gmail.com wrote:
But may I suggest we consider changing the name stealth address to
something more neutral?
ACK. Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a
little cringe-worthy.
Private address would be fine if
Do any people who aren't computer programmers or physicists ever use the
term static?
I liked routing address.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
static address seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended
use/direction.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014
Routing address is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and
familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or
not...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami r...@gnomon.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
static address seems
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:17:33PM +, I wrote:
How about just calling them 'type S addresses'?
(Assuming they're encoded in such as way that they actually start with 's'.
Otherwise whatever prefix is actually used, obviously.)
May need to modify the network address format to include the ability to
differentiate IPv6 clearnet vs. Tor addresses
sipa already implemented some clever hack where the 80-bit Tor keys are
mapped to a subregion of reserved IPv6 space, giving magical IPv6 hidden
service addresses. So addr
Might I propose "reusable address".I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. The feature is only useful if/when broadly
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:51:21 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
The goal of all that is that we get to keep our existing IPv4 based
anti-sybil heuristics, so we can’t possibly make anything worse,
only better. Plus, we’ve now set things up so in future if/when we
come up with a better anti-sybil system
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jeremy Spilman jer...@taplink.co wrote:
Might I propose reusable address.
I like this too.
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2014 04:05 PM, Jeremy Spilman wrote:
Might I propose reusable address.
Say it like it is. This is the only suggestion so far that I really like.
No amount of finger wagging got people to stop using the block chain
for data storage, but
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:09:01 -0800, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
I was meaning to comment on the SPV privacy properties.
For full-node use these unlinkable static addresses have quite nice
properties. It also nicely solves the problem of having to educate users
and wallet authors to
Yes. Good idea(s).
Might I propose reusable address.
I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so
encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'.
It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. The
feature is only
One challenge with reusable addresses is that while they result in a
small constant overhead for full nodes in searching for their own
transactions they create large overheads for SPV nodes.
One way to address this is for the SPV nodes to hand their servers
their blinding private key so that the
My goal here is not necessarily to hide P2P nodes - we still need lots of
clearnet P2P nodes for the forseeable future no matter what. Rather we're
just using hidden services as a way to get authentication and encryption.
Actually the 6-hop hidden service circuits are overkill for this
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 23:51 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
...
3) SPV wallets that want to get a good mix of nodes for measuring
pending transactions identify nodes on the clearnet via their addr
announcements+service flag, in the normal way. They select some of
these nodes using the standard
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 20:29 -0800, Miron wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 23:51 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
...
3) SPV wallets that want to get a good mix of nodes for measuring
pending transactions identify nodes on the clearnet via their addr
announcements+service flag, in the normal way. They
I like reusable address.
It is very clear what the intended purpose is and gives a subtle hint that
other types of address should not be re-used.
On 16 January 2014 00:44, Eric Martindale e...@ericmartindale.com wrote:
One variation of this, recycled address, might avert misconceptions that
16 matches
Mail list logo
