Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: PaymentACK semantics

2014-01-31 Thread Christophe Biocca
The merchant can always act maliciously by simply not delivering the goods. The only recourse the payment protocol provides at that point is that you have proof the merchant is acting maliciously (or at the very least his payment system is broken). Your scheme just adds an ACK of the specific

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Extension for BIP-0070 to support recurring payments

2014-01-31 Thread Mike Hearn
That looks OK at a very high level. Things you probably want to think about: - How to trigger it off the existing payment protocol (no new top level messages or mime types or uri extensions please) - Data structures to define the payment schedule - Do you allow pre-submission of time