Take a look at BIP 73:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0073.mediawiki
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Alex Kotenko wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
>
> I'm implementing support for BIP70 in my POS at the moment, and I've just
> realized that with options you're proposing usecase I'm lo
Hi Andreas
I'm implementing support for BIP70 in my POS at the moment, and I've just
realized that with options you're proposing usecase I'm looking for is not
covered.
Right now, before BIP70, I'm sending BIP21 URI via NFC or QR code, and I
need to still be able to use it for backwards compatib
On 20 March 2014 02:41, Odinn Cyberguerrilla <
odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net> wrote:
> I wish to state that I fundamentally disagree with this proposal of use
> cases for W3C payments workshop. Please read my following explanation and
> then do what you will:
>
> At one time I was invited to jo
I wish to state that I fundamentally disagree with this proposal of use
cases for W3C payments workshop. Please read my following explanation and
then do what you will:
At one time I was invited to join the Web Payments conference calls. I
considered it and then declined due to the very CLAs tha
Hello Bitcoiners,
I have been working on some use cases for the W3C payments workshop. I'd
like to include Bitcoin, but I might not have the time:
Here is what I have:
https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsMobileUseCases
Which is editable with a w3c username and password. Jus
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this:
>
> """
> $ ./bitcoind
> ./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
> ./bitcoind)
> ./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
> ./bitcoin
I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this:
"""
$ ./bitcoind
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
$ ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.1
"If you have database problems are you perhaps switching between 0.8.x and
0.9.x with the same directory?"
I think that may have been the issue.
Maybe now that I have a 0.9.0 official binary, when I switch to the source
builds I won't have the issue.
However, I think I'll do what you do and have
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Angel Leon wrote:
> the command line options mention a -checklevel parameter.
> I've been passing 0 assuming there'd be little to no verification, but
> it's happened a few times that when I open the official binary (while not
> doing development) there's some so
the command line options mention a -checklevel parameter.
I've been passing 0 assuming there'd be little to no verification, but it's
happened a few times that when I open the official binary (while not doing
development) there's some sort of database corruption and Bitcoin-Qt needs
to reindex blo
Bitcoin Core version 0.9.0 is now available from:
https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.0/
This is a release candidate for a new major version. A major version brings
both new features and bug fixes.
Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
How
11 matches
Mail list logo