There is a tromendous progress and we are working hard on the 2 factor
You an follow our progress at :
We are still at development and there is a lot to be done :)
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net wrote:
You are right there is a bug in there.
But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-)
Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig- key recoveries
would fail erroneously...
Values 2 and 3 are only
Christophe Biocca wrote:
it becomes trivial with a few tries to split the network into two
halves: (tx1 before tx2, tx2 before tx1).
before implies T=0. That is a much too optimistic choice for T; 50%
of nodes would misidentify the respend.
Tom Harding t...@thinlink.com wrote:
This e-mail is an extract of my post:
Some posts ago I presented the DECOR protocol. One of the assumptions I
did was that the amount of coins each miner earned in competing blocks
was approximately the same. This could be true for cryptocurrencies
Mail list logo