Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70 proposed changes

2014-05-06 Thread Alon Muroch
Hi Odinn, There is a tromendous progress and we are working hard on the 2 factor auth. You an follow our progress at : We are still at development and there is a lot to be done :) On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in key.cpp

2014-05-06 Thread Pieter Wuille
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, wrote: You are right there is a bug in there. But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-) Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig- key recoveries would fail erroneously... Values 2 and 3 are only

Re: [Bitcoin-development] A statistical consensus rule for reducing 0-conf double-spend risk

2014-05-06 Thread Tom Harding
Christophe Biocca wrote: it becomes trivial with a few tries to split the network into two halves: (tx1 before tx2, tx2 before tx1). before implies T=0. That is a much too optimistic choice for T; 50% of nodes would misidentify the respend. Tom Harding wrote: -

[Bitcoin-development] DECOR+ Better block selection rule

2014-05-06 Thread Sergio Lerner
This e-mail is an extract of my post: Some posts ago I presented the DECOR protocol. One of the assumptions I did was that the amount of coins each miner earned in competing blocks was approximately the same. This could be true for cryptocurrencies