There was recently some discussion around dnsseeds. Currently some
dnsseeds are getting blocked by ISPs because the hosts they pick up
(which run bitcoin core nodes) often run rather web servers alongside
which serve malware or whatever else and thus end up on IP-based malware
blacklists.
Of
Why would we want to have anything to do with people who are hosting
malware? Or do I misunderstand?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 08:57:53AM +, Matt Corallo wrote:
There was recently some discussion around dnsseeds. Currently some
dnsseeds are getting blocked by ISPs because the hosts they pick
Gregory Maxwell recently pointed out to me in private conservation that
there potentially existed a fundemental disagreement between him and I
on our philosophical approaches to blockchains, in that he prioritised
the notion of the blockchain as an anti-replay oracle, and I prioritised
it as a
Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
I added a safety check to my crawler and seed.bitcoinstats.com should
not return IPs that also run HTTP or HTTPS, hopefully this'll keep it
off blacklists :-)
--
Christian Decker
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matt Corallo bitcoin-l...@bluematt.me
Well, some ISPs, when they see an IP address serving malware, will
(apparently) simply replace DNS results for anything returning that IP
with a warning page.
One solutions is to just blindly block everything with HTTP(S), as
Christian has done, but this is a rather ugly solution, since many
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Spilman jer...@taplink.co wrote:
are dnsseeds being blocked
ostensibly because they are acting as dyanamic DNS infrastructure for
malware sites?
Pretty much appears to be the case. In every instance it appears to be
automated. This predates the msft
Getting back to the original topic...
I would recommend first taking a look at how the current tests are built
(via autoconf/automake) in src/test. There are several surfaces to test,
RPC, REST, P2P, internal unit tests, and more. Then, Travis applies a
second level of testing via the
Thanks Jeff. I'll start looking there.
Will Bickford
In Google We Trust
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
Getting back to the original topic...
I would recommend first taking a look at how the current tests are built
(via autoconf/automake) in src/test.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:55:28PM +1100, Gareth Williams wrote:
I covered this in my original post: 1-way-pegs allow the creation of new
valuable tokens without those tokens being useful for speculation.
I stand corrected. A permanent 1-way-peg is sufficient to preserve
scarcity; nothing
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 02:18:18PM +0800, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
Care to expand?
Freimarkets does not require proof of publication of bids or asks, which
are distributed out of band from the block chain until a match is made. It
does not guarantee ordering of market transactions. Indeed,
10 matches
Mail list logo
