On 05/13/2015 09:31 PM, Aaron Voisine wrote:
by people and businesses deciding to not use on-chain settlement.
I completely agree. Increasing fees will cause people voluntary
economize on blockspace by finding alternatives, i.e. not bitcoin.
This strikes me as a leap. There are alternatives
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
1) Nomenclature: call tx_size tx_cost and real_size tx_bytes?
2) If we have a reasonable hard *byte* limit, I don't think that we need
the MAX(). In fact, it's probably OK to go
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
I wonder if having a miner flag would be good for the network.
Makes it trivial to find miners and DoS attack them - a huge risk to the
network as a whole, as well as the miners.
To mitigate against this, two chaintips
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Stephen stephencalebmo...@gmail.com
I think this could be mitigated by counting confirmations differently. We
should think of confirmations as only coming from blocks following the
miners' more strict rule set. So if a merchant were to see payment for
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Owen Gunden ogun...@phauna.org wrote:
This strikes me as a leap. There are alternatives that still use bitcoin
as the unit of value, such as sidechains, offchain, etc. To say that
these are not bitcoin is misleading.
The only options available today and in
I agree with this analysis. I'm not sure if we will increase 1 MB
block size or not, but with a block size that small, it is all but
impossible for most people on the planet to ever own even a single utxo.
At 7tps, how long would it take to give 1 utxo to all of the 7 billion
On 5/16/2015 1:35 PM, Owen Gunden wrote:
There are alternatives that still use bitcoin as the unit of value,
such as sidechains, offchain, etc. To say that these are not bitcoin
Is it? Nobody thinks euro accepted implies Visa is ok, even though
Visa is just a bunch of extra
Mail list logo