it's not the
end of the world and things could be easily switched to go the lkml route...
--adam
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Adam Weiss wrote:
>
>> Hi Warren,
>>
>> If you set dmarc_moderation_action to
Hi Warren,
If you set dmarc_moderation_action to "Munge from", the list will detect
when someone posts from a domain that publishes a request for strict
signature checking for all mails originating from it (in DNS) and rewrite
the envelope-from to the list's address. Reply-to will be added and se
Recent versions of mailman strip DKIM signatures, rewrite the envelope-from
to use an address at the list's domain and set reply-to to the original
authors address to resolve the DMARC issue. I'm on several lists that do
this and it works just fine.
+1 on moving the list. Given the fact that the
FYI on behalf of jgarzik...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed additional options for pruned
nodes
To: Adam Weiss
Maybe you could forward my response to the list as an FYI?
On Tue, May 12
>
>
> Using a desktop website and mobile device for 2/3 multisig in lieu of a
> hardware device (trezor) and desktop website (mytrezor) works, but the key
> is that the device used to input the two signatures cannot be in the same
> band. What you are protecting against are MITM attacks. The issu
5 matches
Mail list logo
