be upgraded.
Now that fRelayTxes is part of the protocol, the version number should be
upgraded to reflect this fact.
From: Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net
To: Paul Lyon pml...@hotmail.ca
Cc: Turkey Breast turkeybre...@yahoo.com;
bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
I don't get why this is such a contentious change?
Before I was able to use asserts to check the expected length of length of
messages per protocol version, I could pass in dumb iterators that just parse
the byte stream and I could serialize and deserialize a message to check the
parser is
saying it should and
the code in bitcoind indicating it should. Nowhere was this written. It doesn't
help other implementations to have an unclear behaviour that depends on some
magic from one implementation.
From: Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net
To: Turkey Breast
See this BIP. I'm not sure if this is a bug or what, but it would be good if
messages always had a fixed number of fields per protocol version.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0060#Code_Updates
This BIP details everything that needs to be done and proposes a protocol
upgrade.
needs to be
optional anyway.
From: Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net
To: Turkey Breast turkeybre...@yahoo.com
Cc: Bitcoin Dev bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Missing fRelayTxes in version
5 matches
Mail list logo
