Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread odinn
-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJURFhXAAoJEGxwq/inSG8Cpc0H+wZauz7iOj4XZJSI3VBv+5WL YAe8kDSOpa5ZprFntsFfKVU+cmSjXckPjCRI9

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10 release schedule

2014-10-26 Thread odinn
@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUTLbyAAoJEGxwq

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10 release schedule

2014-10-26 Thread odinn
commit?) Possibly also related (suggested dusting feature): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4079#issuecomment-41010593 Thanks in advance for your responses. Wladimir wrote: On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:55 AM, odinn odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains 2-way pegging (Re: is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?)

2014-11-03 Thread odinn
~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUV9mzAAoJEGxwq/inSG8C0qwIAJZdOmeSK7pIw2KTj0lQlPIp MIc1w2KL+qIVXSrlqyNlcIhlW4gK+/cuYD+PZ7wSGHV2k9OD6AcOo3JfGYgk4LP/ 3GIrY

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Running a full node

2014-11-06 Thread odinn
of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUW+pWAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CMOEH/jLElWVYTepe0kwnHiguvM2T Y16fSfLuptdpHU0+2du0U7zO14UvhL7mA2cQxDPxvC72hqRfMld3x5+Pz1mM8aik Xgot1XrFEo2fQn4CRyaEdwIj0SG5+dcnNSPWJcAf/aLSmw6BFaFgVbG9Qenzrvfn

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network paper

2014-11-26 Thread odinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Please see also the following: https://cpunks.org//pipermail/cypherpunks/2014-November/005971.html Respect, - -Odinn Jeff Garzik: I don't recall being contacted directly, but the attack has been discussed. It relies on a number of conditions

Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoind as a library

2014-11-27 Thread odinn
-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Setting the record straight on Proof-of-Publication

2014-12-12 Thread odinn
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUivCNAAoJEGxwq/inSG8ChVUH/26zj2pj7AF

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Setting the record straight on Proof-of-Publication

2014-12-16 Thread odinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 bleep bloop Peter Todd: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:41:34PM +, odinn wrote: Peter... It kind of sounds to me that (as fine of a position paper as this is) on _certain_ points, you're falling prey to the but it's inefficient, but it's

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why Bitcoin is and isn't like the Internet

2015-01-21 Thread odinn
://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUwAGjAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CJoAIAMDR0h40IhFQNa8BW4AFeKUR 7tg84e752c7wY153GY/P7MOFL6w3E9h4tXzxdohTMMfF5Q6Ip6HaaifYmMpegFSS WEHK0a3C2F+4sQMmMBtWbfyPsG5sJYtldY5hboSbh/6vXJJLXLSd+Sz3WHYx1Qjs qn6sw5CA2Q0fborTxcsNZixUXD/OF5tTjDozp

Re: [Bitcoin-development] The legal risks of auto-updating wallet software; custodial relationships

2015-01-20 Thread odinn
-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUvsnBAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CGekIAJH4lUdk81sVfQqxZ4sKOKFM 5iAvCD4JNuV

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bi-directional micropayment channels with CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY

2015-01-11 Thread odinn
://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUsj9+AAoJEGxwq/inSG8Cvu8H/RutYcVPdN+GrtAYxNkm2x7n v

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against network disruption as a service startups

2015-03-22 Thread odinn
/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVD34mAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CvrQH/28Rt26oGdo9rS+PaR1fIQ1p

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against network disruption as a service startups

2015-03-22 Thread odinn
of the public blockchain is for Chainalysis, whether it be for the verification of transactions, research or otherwise. -Original Message- From: odinn odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net Sent: ‎23/‎03/‎2015 1:48 PM To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net bitcoin-development

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against network disruption as a service startups

2015-03-23 Thread odinn
. -Original Message- From: odinn odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net Sent: ‎23/‎03/‎2015 1:48 PM To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Criminal complaints against network disruption as a service startups

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers

2015-06-18 Thread odinn
concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVg0sHAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CuFcH/0tzRWWyy3wmDegNx463xoaq EhG/dNqoIvavMlyJrKfKWPK6Mndgo9BtxkYbvOlO40Y51SW4SaisWGzHRg4HyIbJ 0Orp

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers

2015-06-18 Thread odinn
/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVg0HiAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CXOwIAKSGRJPtSx+untgMERwE7lW7 9p0gWz4jvKhyO+RrGPXlofckvp4Fp/7Yxa+TDLcXbzGi6OesX9yIyN7e06LJW4DP h7V2PwzS49ZyB/krd03HjvWMFnhoGy7zB7M1okq5myIvx+h1htX9TirNbDl7PU9Z SWyNNw+GXPsIV

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers

2015-06-18 Thread odinn
mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes

2015-06-16 Thread odinn
list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity

2015-06-14 Thread odinn
-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

[Bitcoin-development] Scope narrowing for proposals to address block size limit debate, an inquiry

2015-06-18 Thread odinn
now... your thoughts? - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVgnLuAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CchMH/0zm+A7Uqp8SpU+CsJr3lF2+ 0re

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes

2015-06-16 Thread odinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter, my response below On 06/16/2015 10:46 AM, Peter Todd wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:26:07AM -0700, odinn wrote: This is very well done. Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Address Expiration to Prevent Reuse

2015-06-12 Thread odinn
@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development - -- http://abis.io ~ a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step

2015-06-13 Thread odinn
https://keybase.io/odinn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVe8gvAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CcykH/0d+WuPnzFWooCRJR+FwaI4w Ad0z5GSLfYKGnmMMbbqkLsIA2GsfRAvivrsfZYd4slF5C7HEDGa3J/NC72U46dk6 qVm07UNBO3V+loLJtStIQQkg3tVGWjXeiySf4E4b8wlaZiBMS9WW0sAOWUJiGMDQ jKNRpjXobkQGd8C

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts?

2013-12-07 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Hello, re. the dedicated server for bitcoin.org idea, I have a few thoughts 1) I have commented in a blogpost of August 2013 at https://odinn.cyberguerrilla.org/ with some thoughts relative to possible issues with CA related to bitcoin.org - where I mentioned something relative to the DigiCert

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts?

2013-12-10 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
I've been lurking on this convo since it began, but I wanted to say thanks, theymos cheers to you all and yay for decentralization, wherever it leads. -odinn muh latest: http://github.com/ABISprotocol/ABIS On Sun, Dec 8, 2013, at 03:11 PM, Drak wrote: It's not just about trust

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses

2014-01-14 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
as presented I would be happy to distill it further, but I am interested in your thoughts as to the idea generally and how to further present it. -Odinn On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:13:08AM -0800, Jeremy Spilman wrote: It's a given this will be implemented for Payment Protocol. The question is whether

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses

2014-01-15 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Yes. Good idea(s). Might I propose reusable address. I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'. It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. The feature is only

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9rc1 release schedule

2014-01-18 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
ABISprotocol hat: on regarding: stuff not getting into blockchain in a day's time, microdonations not facilitated as much as they could be, that would be: very bad much news such fail Seriously, that would not be so good. Hope I made you laugh a bit vendor hat: on BitPay sure would like

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9rc1 release schedule

2014-01-18 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
that may implement aspects of the ABIS concept as presented, but it is in very very early stage(es). I hope you had a good laugh, that was my intent. good morning / afternoon / evening On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net wrote: ABISprotocol

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Extension for BIP-0070 to support recurring payments

2014-01-27 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Greatly appreciate seeing this discussion occur. This is something that potentially could be supported through a bounty - possibly a process BIP? Possibly related: https://gist.github.com/ABISprotocol/8515891 Yes, recurring payments and subscriptions is a frequently-requested feature. It

[Bitcoin-development] Malware authors and best practices for addressing the issue from development / licensing perspective or other

2014-02-09 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Hello, I have a request, which is how do developers address the circumstance in which someone utilizes your code as part of some effort to deprive (or steal as the case may be) someone of their bitcoin? This hasn't happened to me, but I have posed a question about it at bitcointalk:

Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoind json API (gettx/raw) (newbie questions #2)

2014-02-18 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Hey everybody, here's another question that I have: I'd like a small bit of clarification about the gettx / getrawtransaction (decoded) api call. I understand that I can find the address that a transaction output is directed at / available to for future use sits in the vout array in the

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fee drop

2014-02-25 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
So, just to be clear, we're adding, say, a memory limited mempool or something prior to release so this fee drop doesn't open up an obvious low-risk DDoS exploit right? As we all know, the network bandwidth DoS attack mitigation strategy relies on transactions we accept to mempools

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fee drop

2014-02-25 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Am suggesting a (possible) mitigation of [possible flooding, etc], via some kind of discussion (potentially process BIP, related to bundling and / or randomization) not now, but down the road. However, needs more thought and analysis (you mentioned code audit?) before it could be floated around

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is this a safe thing to be doing with ECC addition? (Oracle protocol)

2014-03-03 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Nothing is safe. Take risks. Engage one trouble at a time. Perform unexpected actions. Observe the results. Rinse and repeat. Ignore the lions. They too shall pass. Do not sleep under a roof. Carry no money or food. Go alone to places frightening to the common brand of men. Become a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] New side channel attack that can recover Bitcoin keys

2014-03-05 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
One wonders also re. bitmessage, though that may not be relevant to this particular list. On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:21:52AM -0500, Kevin wrote: On 3/5/2014 7:49 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: A new practical technique has been published that can recover secp256k1 private keys after observing OpenSSL

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol?

2014-03-11 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Hello, I wanted to just add a very brief note to this discussion, that presently for multisignature creation and management (new transaction etc) I've been using this: https://coinb.in/multisig/ There were some initial bumps in the road but they were worked out, see full thread more or less

Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc

2014-03-14 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
to read samples of the other stuff going on here. -Odinn http://abis.io Resurrecting this topic. Bitcoin Wallet moved to mBTC several weeks ago, which was disappointing -- it sounded like the consensus was uBTC, and moving to uBTC later --which will happen-- may result in additional user confusion

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin for W3C Payments Workshop, March 24-25

2014-03-19 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
I wish to state that I fundamentally disagree with this proposal of use cases for W3C payments workshop. Please read my following explanation and then do what you will: At one time I was invited to join the Web Payments conference calls. I considered it and then declined due to the very CLAs

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70 proposed changes

2014-05-05 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
(in a fully decentralized way that resides fully on one's device or devices). For some reason maidsafe keeps rising up in my brain, have bitcoin core developers touched bases with maidsafe developers on these kind of fine points? Just thoughts and questions. -Odinn On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in key.cpp

2014-05-05 Thread odinn . cyberguerrilla
You are right there is a bug in there. But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-) I think i see a bug: line 273 of key.cpp if (rec0 || rec=3) return false; Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig- key recoveries would fail

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Cooperative Proof-of-Stake whitpaper

2014-05-21 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
I completed a whitepaper for Bitcoin a proof-of-stake version which uses a single nomadic verifiable mint agent and distributed replication of a single blockchain by compensated full nodes to achieve 6-hop, sub-second transaction acknowledgement times. Plus it pays dividends to holders

[Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes

2014-06-16 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
look forward to your remarks. Respect, Odinn -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple

[Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question

2014-06-17 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
on twitter or similar. Respect, Odinn -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ASIC-proof mining

2014-07-07 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Just as an aside to this lengthy convo, the Cryptonote-based BCN recently had some interesting updates which made it easier for ordinary computers (nothing special) to handle it. I realize that's not Bitcoin, but I thought I'd throw it out there. Thanks Mike. Indeed, I am aware of current

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4?

2014-07-07 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
Wait, I thought SOCKS4 was supposed to help somehow in terms of prevention of leaking of information? Or maybe I am misremembering. Here's what I'm thinking of... 1) https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/Preventing_Tor_DNS_Leaks 2) More regarding TOR, I keep seeing these warnings

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4?

2014-07-07 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net wrote: Wait, I thought SOCKS4 was supposed to help somehow in terms of prevention of leaking of information? SOCKS4a (unlike SOCKS4) supports doing DNS lookups on the server, but it is not supported

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsidering github

2014-08-29 Thread Odinn Cyberguerrilla
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote: It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is. Despite my complaining about github, I don't like the idea of moving somewhere