On Dec 20, 2014 8:49 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
However the converse is not possible: anti-replay cannot be used to
implement proof-of-publication. Knowing that no conflicting message exists
says nothing about who be in posession of that message, or indeed, any
message at all. Thus
21, 2014 9:23 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 07:49:17AM -0600, paul snow wrote:
On Dec 20, 2014 8:49 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
However the converse is not possible: anti-replay cannot be used to
implement proof-of-publication. Knowing
[[Since I sent this while the List Server was down, it didn't actually go
to everyone. Forgive me if you ended up with two copies.]]
Peter provides an excellent summary of Proof of Publication, which starts
with defining it as being composed of a solution to the double spend
problem. He
Peter provides an excellent summary of Proof of Publication, which starts
with defining it as being composed of a solution to the double spend
problem. He requires Proof-of-receipt (proof every member of p in audience
P has received a message m), Proof-of-non-publication (proof a message m
has
4 matches
Mail list logo
