I fully support this (it's what I suggested over a year ago), but what it
comes down to is BitPay, Coinbase, Blockchain and Bitstamp getting
together, agreeing what they're going to use, and doing a little joint
customer education campaign around it. If there's community momentum around
My point is that you never apply the prefixes to the currency unit itself.
We don't spend kilodollars or megadollars.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Luke Dashjr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Saturday, May 03, 2014 12:54:37 AM Ben Davenport wrote:
My only addition is that I think we
Another vote in support of uBTC. I made my position clear in May of last
year. Since then, Dogecoin has essentially PROVEN the psychological value
of a low-valued large-balance currency.
The whole unit change seems so
Well, at least we don't have to worry about cache invalidation.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:15:40AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
I must say, this shed is mighty fine looking. It'd be a great place to
store our bikes.
You can create a transaction which spends the output to yourself, attaching
a fee to that transaction. In order for miners to grab the transaction fee
on that transaction, they would have to also mine the original transaction.
Likely, you'd have to do this by hand, but software could be written to
Mail list logo