Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?

2015-06-19 Thread Matt @ Envrin Group
er) or overload 44 (which > would be misleading). > > Did I either a) answer or b) misunderstand your questions? > -- > Matt Smith | Gem > https://gem.co | GH: @thedoctor > > > > On 6/19/15 2:25 PM, Matt @ Envrin Group wrote: >> Hi Matt, >> >>

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?

2015-06-19 Thread Matt @ Envrin Group
Hi Matt, I think your best bet is probably just push it out privately via blog post / Github, and see if it gains any traction with other developers. I'm a little uncertain as to the relevance though. All those variables (purpose, network, asset_type, account, change, index) need to be stor