Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-13 Thread Ruben de Vries
The idea is more like BIP44/45 to have a 'standard' that software can comply by and express they do so that it makes a step towards compatibility between (wallet) software. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Peter Todd wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:13:33PM +, Luke

Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public keys for p2sh multisig transactions

2015-01-16 Thread Ruben de Vries
Since we only need the sorting for creating the scriptPubKey, wouldn't it make the most sense to sort it by the way it represented in that context? On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Wladimir wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Matt Whitlock wrote: