Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90%

2015-05-26 Thread joliver
You're the Chief Scientist of __ViaCoin__ a alt with 30 second blocks and you have big banks as clients. Shit like replace-by-fee and leading the anti-scaling mob is for your clients, not Bitcoin. Get the fuck out. Peter Todd - 8930511 Canada Ltd. 1214-1423 Mississauga Valley Blvd. Mississauga

Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)

2015-02-22 Thread joliver
On 2015-02-22 14:33, Peter Todd wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 02:11:31PM +, Adam Back wrote: My actual point outside of the emotive stuff (and I should've stayed away from that too) is how about we explore ways to improve practical security of fast confirmation transactions, and if we

Re: [Bitcoin-development] The relationship between Proof-of-Publication and Anti-Replay Oracles

2015-01-06 Thread joliver
On 2014-12-22 00:11, Peter Todd wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:48:01AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote: The classic proof-of-publication system is to embed opaque data (as far as bitcoin miners are concerned) in transactions using OP_RETURN. A significance of establishing proof-of-publication as a