Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal

2015-05-27 Thread Patrick Strateman
There is absolutely no reason to do this. Any reasonable micro-controller can build merkle tree roots significantly faster than is necessary. 1 Th/s walks the nonce range once every 4.3ms. The largest valid merkle trees are 14 nodes high. That translates to 28 SHA256 ops per 4.3ms or 6511 SHA25

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain

2014-12-10 Thread patrick
The goal is to have an opportunity cost to breaking the rules. Proof of Burn is a real cost for following the rules. On 12/10/2014 01:35 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote: > We spend scarce resources external to the digital realm to create Bitcoin. > Real world sacrifice is needed to avoid “nothing at sta

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Update alert false positives

2014-04-19 Thread patrick
The alert system filters based on the clients version number. The ubuntu bitcoin ppa is dynamically linked to openssl unlike the binaries available from bitcoin.org There is no way currently to notify users of 0.9.0 w/ static linking without also notify 0.9.0 w/ dynamic linking. On 04/19/2014

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts?

2013-12-08 Thread Patrick
Have you considered black lotus dedicated servers? On 12/08/2013 03:16 PM, Saïvann Carignan wrote: >> Issues that would need to be resolved: >> >> 1) Who pays for it? Most obvious answer: Foundation. However there's >> currently a fairly clear line between the foundation website and the >> bitcoin

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Floating fees and SPV clients

2013-12-02 Thread Patrick Mead
First time posting to this mailing list so feel free to ignore me if this is a stupid idea. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > > We need to get away from the notion of senders attaching fees anyway. This is > the wrong > way around because it’s the recipient who cares about dou

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP proposal - patch to raise selfish mining threshold.

2013-11-05 Thread Patrick
The ratio of honest miners that mine the first block they see is > 0.5 Your proposed solution would reduce that ratio to 0.5 In other words your proposed change would make the attack you describe easier not harder. On 11/05/2013 09:26 AM, Ittay wrote: > That sounds like selfish mining, and the m

Re: [Bitcoin-development] CTxIn::nSequence

2013-06-20 Thread Patrick Strateman
It's well answered by this stack exchange question. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2025/what-is-txins-sequence On 06/20/2013 05:54 PM, Marko Otbalkana wrote: > Could anyone tell me what CTxIn::nSequence is meant for? > > Best Regards, > -Marko > > > ---

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Blockchain alternative storage

2013-06-05 Thread Patrick Strateman
If you're only interested in storing the best chain then a fairly simple schema is possible. CREATE TABLE blocks ( hash bytea NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, index integer NOT NULL UNIQUE, CONSTRAINT block_hash_size_check CHECK ((octet_length(hash) = (256 / 8))) ); CREATE TABLE transaction_inpu