On 21 May 2013 01:59, Mark Friedenbach m...@monetize.io wrote:
At the developer round-table it was asked if the payment protocol would
alt-chains, and Gavin noted that it has a UTF-8 encoded string
identifying the network (main or test). As someone with two
proposals in the works which also
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to one
relationship between the described object and the UUID. In this case the
gensis block may not uniquely identify a coin.
What does this mean?
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to one
relationship between the described object and the UUID. In this case the
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Some out of band algo/hash could work so long as there was a one to
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:20:22 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2013 16:07, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
In some cases, multiple currencies can use the same blockchain (not just the
singular genesis block). This use case *is* something we want to encourage -
no reason for people to make an entirely new blockchain if their altcoin
Getting back to the original proposal:
RE: uuid instead of main / test in the payment protocol:
I vote no.
The payment protocol will become at least 3 BIPs:
1) Protocol messages (current gist, essentially)
2) MIME type
3) bitcoin: URI extension
An alt coin will need its own version of (2) and
At the developer round-table it was asked if the payment protocol would
alt-chains, and Gavin noted that it has a UTF-8 encoded string
identifying the network (main or test). As someone with two
proposals in the works which also require chain/coin identification (one
for merged mining, one for
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Mark Friedenbach m...@monetize.io wrote:
So as to remain reasonably compliant with RFC 4122, I recommend that we
use Version 4 (random) UUIDs, with the random bits extracted from the
double-SHA256 hash of the genesis block of the chain. (For colored
coins, the
Bitcoinj already has such chain id's and we use standard Java style reverse
DNS names: org.bitcoin.main, etc. If we want a more global naming system
that seems like a good compromise between uniqueness and readability.
On 20 May 2013 19:45, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20,
10 matches
Mail list logo
