Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-17 Thread Wladimir
This is not just a political issue. The internet as we know it is at
stake, and bitcoin depends directly on a working, single, globally
connected internet (at least for now, until mesh networking goes
anywhere...).

*Everyone* using bitcoin has the interest in keeping the internet working
and un-balkanized. That's not a political opinion, it's a fact.

The laws could also criminalize both the users and developers, if they
regard bitcoin as a payment network. And countries aren't too fussy about
extradition to the US (see the case of Richard O'Dwyer).

Though I agree that SOPA and PIPA are just manifestations of a brand of
censorship that is spreading all over the world. Stopping these laws won't
solve the underlying issue either. Other countries will keep pushing for
them, and we can't blank out the page for every country.

However, that does not make the issue political and thus meaningless.
Also: being too small to matter is never a good argument to not do
something. It is fear paralysis.

Wladimir

2012/1/17 Jorge Timón timon.elvi...@gmail.com

 It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
 political organization for being against censorship.
 This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
 basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.
 And as Gregory shows it clearly affects bitcoin directly.


 --
 Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-17 Thread Stefan Thomas
I'm firmly against a *blackout* - it would harm users' trust in Bitcoin 
since people looking to download the client or to get information about 
Bitcoin may end up in the wrong place. I constantly have to delete 
YouTube spam advertising this or that miracle GPU miner or secure 
Bitcoin client, which of course are all just the same trojan.

As for making a statement or putting up a banner - that's ok with me.

On 1/17/2012 7:15 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Kyle Hendersonk...@old.school.nz  wrote:
 For those that believe one particularly noisy country in the North America
 region with a policy called SOPA or PIPA directly affects Bitcoin - can you
 point out precisely where it does so?
 In addition to the concerns about internet freedom and domain name
 system filtering which are against the interests of bitcoin users and
 the bitcoin system generally, SOPA contains new requirements for
 payment networks which may adversely impact Bitcoin services
 businesses and limit their ability to do business in the US and other
 places where similar legislation is adopted.  There are many millions
 of potential Bitcoin users in the US, so US law matters for our
 ecosystem even though far from all Bitcoin users are in the US
 themselves.

 (21) PAYMENT NETWORK PROVIDER-
  (A) IN GENERAL- The term `payment network provider' means
 an entity that directly or indirectly provides the proprietary
 services, infrastructure, and software to effect or facilitate a
 debit, credit, or other payment transaction.
 [...]
  (i) PREVENTING AFFILIATION- A payment network provider
 shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures, as
 expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being
 served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may
 order, designed to prevent, prohibit, or suspend its service from
 completing payment transactions involving customers located within the
 United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and
 the payment account--
  (I) which is used by the foreign infringing site,
 or portion thereof, that is subject to the order; and
  (II) through which the payment network provider
 would complete such payment transactions.

 If you really want to go for the more extreme interpretation, it's not
 hard to conclude that the Bitcoin system itself is a payment network
 by the definition under the act, and if so in theory the AG's office
 could— without due process— order miners and mining pools located in
 the US to, for example, not process transactions containing the well
 known addresses of targeted infringing sites (e.g. The Wikileaks
 donation address).  Though I personally think this is far out.

 I also think that other people will covered the SOPA/PIPA awareness
 (e.g. Wikipedia is shutting down for 24 hours) more than we could
 possibly do with our own resources.

 But this attitude of it being someone elses problem? I think thats
 nonsense. We live in _one world_, one world which is getting smaller
 every day.  The value of a network—or of a economy— comes from the
 number of potential connections it can make. One reason Bitcoin is
 good is because it deconstructs some of the old barriers and anything
 that risks imposing new ones is a threat to us all.

 So, don't participate because bitcoin.org's help would be so small as
 to be pointless— sure.  But because it doesn't matter? hardly.

 --
 Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-17 Thread Luke-Jr
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:42:51 AM Jorge Timón wrote:
 It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
 political organization for being against censorship.
 This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
 basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.

Censorship is, in principle, good. Free speech and democracy are, in princple, 
evil. Idolizing Liberty is also evil. Your backward morals are worse than a 
political issue.

How about taking a few minutes to read this article by Bishop Sanborn? ;)
http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=13catname=7

--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-17 Thread James Burkle
I don't think this is the right mailing list for discussion of this
Blackout topic. I know this is definitely not the right mailing list
for proselytizing.

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
 On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:42:51 AM Jorge Timón wrote:
 It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
 political organization for being against censorship.
 This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
 basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.

 Censorship is, in principle, good. Free speech and democracy are, in princple,
 evil. Idolizing Liberty is also evil. Your backward morals are worse than a
 political issue.

 How about taking a few minutes to read this article by Bishop Sanborn? ;)
        http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=13catname=7

 --
 Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-17 Thread Peter Vessenes
It seems to me that the internet as a whole has got this one covered. I say
this as someone who thinks that BitCoin needs to choose its battles and
craft its reputation extremely carefully; this isn't the most important
fight for BitCoin, nor the most deadly.

I do think SOPA and PIPA could impact bitcoin, what if, for instance,
copyrighted material made its way into the blockchain?

Already the DMCA would make it hard for someone publishing blocks online to
do anything but cease under a DMCA request. SOPA, at least, would go
farther and allow the US to cut all access to 'offending' sites elsewhere
in the world.

At any rate, I don't think these bills are 'aimed at' BitCoin, and the
companies with the most stake are taking the threat quite seriously.
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-16 Thread slush
  I agree Bitcoin should avoid making any bold political stands.

I agree on this. Please don't turn Bitcoin project/homepage into some
political agitation. Not everybody care about political attitude of main
project developers.

slush

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Alan Reiner etothe...@gmail.com wrote:

 **
 You guys are representing both extremes of the issue.  In response to Jeff
 and Luke-Jr, I don't see how this is *just any other poltical issue*.  It
 strikes at the heart of everything Bitcoin is about.  Barring
 Bitcoin-specific legislation, I don't see how any legislation could be more
 relevant to Bitcoin and the community around it.

 On the other hand, Bitcoin is still a non-entity, and shouldn't get in the
 business of making statements.  A central voice for Bitcoin gives the
 impression that it is actually centralized, and one that has opinions.
 Plus I wouldn't be surprised if some, heavily-invested Bitcoin users were
 of the opinion that SOPA/PIPA/whatever could be a huge profit for
 themselves:  once SOPA kicks in and businesses around the world start
 getting cut off for legit or illegitimate purposes, a lot of them could
 potentially switch to Bitcoin to keep their business going.  That could be
 a huge boon for Bitcoin.  You may not agree it's worth the tradeoff, but
 people are selfish and may not actually understand or even care about SOPA
 legislation itself.

 I think it's *not inappropriate* for something to be mentioned on the
 website about Bitcoin's philosophy being threatened by SOPA, but I agree
 Bitcoin should avoid making any bold political stands.  Users could be
 reminded that SOPA affects yet another thing they care about, but it might
 be better to avoid it altogether.  If any response is made, it should be a
 very light one.

 -Alan



 On 01/16/2012 07:30 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:

 Bunk argument. This is an issue that affects bitcoin directly.

 Wikipedia has far more need to remain neutral and apolitical than bitcoin 
 ever does- you've read Satoshi's politically charged whitepaper or seen the 
 genesis block quote.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action

 The Wikipedia community decided on a full and global blackout. Bitcoin should 
 do the same in unison with the rest of the web- sites like Reddit, 4chan and 
 Wikipedia.

 It's funny / almost comical how you consign this to being just another issue 
 or case of moral alarm. Sad.



 - Original Message -
 From: Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com jgar...@exmulti.com
 To: Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com zgen...@yahoo.com
 Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net 
 bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net 
 bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net 
 bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 10:37 PM
 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com 
 zgen...@yahoo.com wrote:

  How is this not the most important world issue right now?

 EVERYTHING is under threat. Go nuclear to show our nerd-rage.

 Everybody blank your personal sites too. Americans, take to the streets. 
 World, go scream at the US embassy.

  There are always issues that raise ire and moral outrage.  I would
 rather that bitcoin.org stay apolitical -- our users will appreciate
 this in the long run.





 --
 Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
 The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
 is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
 Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-16 Thread Luke-Jr
On Monday, January 16, 2012 7:46:39 PM Alan Reiner wrote:
 In response to Jeff and Luke-Jr, I don't see how this is /just any other
 poltical issue/.  It strikes at the heart of everything Bitcoin is about.

Sorry, Bitcoin is not about the same thing to everyone. For me, Bitcoin is 
about one thing: providing a monetary system for the Tonal number system. 
Otherwise, it would be merely an interesting project I have no real concern 
with. To assume everyone has the same interests is a sure-fire way to prevent 
widescale adoption. If you want Bitcoin to succeed, don't try to impose a 
single purpose/about on everyone using it (which a blackout would do).

 Barring Bitcoin-specific legislation, I don't see how any legislation
 could be more relevant to Bitcoin and the community around it.

Bitcoin is an innovative new currency. How is a bill on internet censorship 
(which is badly needed, even if not in the form of SOPA/PIPA) directly 
relevant? I don't think it is.


--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-16 Thread Kyle Henderson
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote:


 There are always issues that raise ire and moral outrage.  I would
 rather that bitcoin.org stay apolitical -- our users will appreciate
 this in the long run.


Agreed :)

For those that believe one particularly noisy country in the North America
region with a policy called SOPA or PIPA directly affects Bitcoin - can you
point out precisely where it does so?
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-16 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Kyle Henderson k...@old.school.nz wrote:
 For those that believe one particularly noisy country in the North America
 region with a policy called SOPA or PIPA directly affects Bitcoin - can you
 point out precisely where it does so?

In addition to the concerns about internet freedom and domain name
system filtering which are against the interests of bitcoin users and
the bitcoin system generally, SOPA contains new requirements for
payment networks which may adversely impact Bitcoin services
businesses and limit their ability to do business in the US and other
places where similar legislation is adopted.  There are many millions
of potential Bitcoin users in the US, so US law matters for our
ecosystem even though far from all Bitcoin users are in the US
themselves.

(21) PAYMENT NETWORK PROVIDER-
(A) IN GENERAL- The term `payment network provider' means
an entity that directly or indirectly provides the proprietary
services, infrastructure, and software to effect or facilitate a
debit, credit, or other payment transaction.
[...]
(i) PREVENTING AFFILIATION- A payment network provider
shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures, as
expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being
served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may
order, designed to prevent, prohibit, or suspend its service from
completing payment transactions involving customers located within the
United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and
the payment account--
(I) which is used by the foreign infringing site,
or portion thereof, that is subject to the order; and
(II) through which the payment network provider
would complete such payment transactions.

If you really want to go for the more extreme interpretation, it's not
hard to conclude that the Bitcoin system itself is a payment network
by the definition under the act, and if so in theory the AG's office
could— without due process— order miners and mining pools located in
the US to, for example, not process transactions containing the well
known addresses of targeted infringing sites (e.g. The Wikileaks
donation address).  Though I personally think this is far out.

I also think that other people will covered the SOPA/PIPA awareness
(e.g. Wikipedia is shutting down for 24 hours) more than we could
possibly do with our own resources.

But this attitude of it being someone elses problem? I think thats
nonsense. We live in _one world_, one world which is getting smaller
every day.  The value of a network—or of a economy— comes from the
number of potential connections it can make. One reason Bitcoin is
good is because it deconstructs some of the old barriers and anything
that risks imposing new ones is a threat to us all.

So, don't participate because bitcoin.org's help would be so small as
to be pointless— sure.  But because it doesn't matter? hardly.

--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org SOPA/PIPA blackout

2012-01-16 Thread Jorge Timón
It may be a political issue, but I don't think wikipedia becomes a
political organization for being against censorship.
This is not about left or right. Is about free speech, one of the
basic principles not only of freedom but also of democracy.
And as Gregory shows it clearly affects bitcoin directly.

--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development