Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-09 Thread Robert Backhaus
I have done test builds on FreeBSD. Clean builds using gcc and clang, building both the qt gui and the command line daemon, and the tests run clean as well. The qt gui runs, and cleanly reindexed and caught up. I have no problems to report. I am not doing any adjustments apart from applying the n

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread Pieter Wuille
On 9 Feb 2013 00:50, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > Then before final release (or rc2, if that is needed) pull #2286 and > create and pull a patch to fix the windows non-determinism problem. #2243 should fix that, I think. -- Pieter ---

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread grarpamp
> Linux builds of 0.8.0rc1 are in good shape; easily gitian-reproduceable. > Windows builds are varying with every compile, and I think I finally > The OSX build is in pretty good shape, but needs > So: I think the path forward is to announce 0.8.0rc1 with the binaries > we've got, to get more test

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread Luke-Jr
On Friday, February 08, 2013 11:49:09 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > Windows builds are varying with every compile, and I think I finally > figured out why: we are not passing the -frandom-seed flag down into > the leveldb build (I used objdump to dump two different binaries, and > they differed only i