Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Ok, ok. but only because this reminds me of the
top-posting and formatting advice page that
I can't seem to find right now.
But I'm not munging what my client decides to
put in to/cc on a g reply either :)
On 5/3/12, Andreas Schildbach andr...@schildbach.de wrote:
Can we add Bitcoin Wallet?
Someone said to me that the cell phone apps they had tried were still
too slow. I'm still using an old phone so I didn't know well what to
answer him. I recomended him bitcoin wallet and bitcoin spinner, but I
On 05/03/2012 11:24 AM, Jorge Timón wrote:
On 5/3/12, Andreas Schildbach andr...@schildbach.de wrote:
Can we add Bitcoin Wallet?
Someone said to me that the cell phone apps they had tried were still
too slow. I'm still using an old phone so I didn't know well what to
answer him.
I never
We're debating the descriptions on the thread. I provided rewritten
descriptions that try and keep with the theme per client goal, whilst
being less technical.
I think it's unclear how best to run this page. It's clear we need one
though. If everyone can just submit whatever they like then we'll
On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 9:22:42 AM Mike Hearn wrote:
The original software written by Satoshi Nakamoto, the project's founder.
This is just wrong. While Bitcoin-Qt is by far the best client, it is
Wladimir's, not Satoshi's.
If your computer is low powered or you aren't willing to tolerate
What computer is the initial start time 24-hours+ now? On normal
systems initial sync-up now takes a couple hours.
OK, I haven't tried a full block chain sync for a while. If it's only a
couple of hours that's great. Let's change that.
Bitcoin-qt is translated into a pretty broad set of languages (now— I
cant tell you how many of them are _good_). Listing language just
under multibit makes it sound like a distinguishing characteristic.
Fair enough then, let's take that out.
Btw, I sent updated text to Genjix Armory. I hope that gets included or
reviewed.
And I agree about the $4k donations thing. That's complete immaterial for
this page. Though the rest of the description there is reasonable, and
might even be better than what I sent Genjix.
-Alan
On Wed, May
While Bitcoin-Qt is by far the best client
This is purely subjective. One's best is another's worst.
These are both things which are particular
suitable to clear objective enumeration.
Yes, so for the purposes of compiling a list of clients
and libraries, please just stick to a table of
On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 12:21:13 PM grarpamp wrote:
Can someone also please set the reply-to header
for these lists. It's really annoying to hit reply and
not have the list address show up. Thanks :)
Try Reply to All
it's unclear how best to run this page. It's clear we need one though.
the right path is probably the middle one - have some descriptions that try
to be neutral
Do it in two parts...
- overview, history, architecture model, 'whys'.
- agnostic table of features, platforms, stats, protocols,
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves
most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves
most of that. assuming the
-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply
] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out
Too technical if you ask me. We want a webpage for the dumbest end-user
I think.
Java? C? What the heck is this? Blockchain? Qt?
Regards,
Raphael
On 05/02/2012 09:34 PM, Gary Rowe wrote:
How about keeping it simple?
Bitcoin-Qt
* Requires the entire blockchain
* Standalone client
* Designed
: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out
: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
blows out
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
Try Reply to All
That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
which dupes to the sender and eventually
On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:34:35 PM Gary Rowe wrote:
Bitcoin-Qt
* Developed in C
This is far less relevant than license...
Armory
* Requires the entire blockchain
* Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt
Or bitcoind?
Electrum
* Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt (on server)
Dependent on
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34
Personally, all this seems far too focused on a centralized website
(bitcoin.org), and presents far too many choices at once to the user.
On bitcoin.org (registered by
Hey, looks good! I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
A couple comments: I don't think the entries for wallet security and
backups accurately describe Armory. Wallet Security should say
Encrypt/Offline or something to to that effect -- after all, offline
wallets are the holy grail
...@yahoo.com
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Hey, looks good! I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
A couple comments: I don't
bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Hey, looks good! I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)
A couple comments: I don't think the entries for wallet security and
backups
25 matches
Mail list logo
