[Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread Gavin Andresen
Linux builds of 0.8.0rc1 are in good shape; easily gitian-reproduceable.

Windows builds are varying with every compile, and I think I finally
figured out why: we are not passing the -frandom-seed flag down into
the leveldb build (I used objdump to dump two different binaries, and
they differed only in the names of some leveldb objects). That should
be an easy makefile fix.

The OSX build is in pretty good shape, but needs
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2286 to compile.

So: I think the path forward is to announce 0.8.0rc1 with the binaries
we've got, to get more testing.

Then before final release (or rc2, if that is needed) pull #2286 and
create and pull a patch to fix the windows non-determinism problem.

I'm done for today, but should have time to sign the windows setup.exe
and send out a rc1 announcement tomorrow.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread Luke-Jr
On Friday, February 08, 2013 11:49:09 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
 Windows builds are varying with every compile, and I think I finally
 figured out why: we are not passing the -frandom-seed flag down into
 the leveldb build (I used objdump to dump two different binaries, and
 they differed only in the names of some leveldb objects). That should
 be an easy makefile fix.

FWIW, this should be already mostly-fixed in pull #2243 I submitted 9 days 
ago... only thing not in that pull is changing gitian to use the standard 
CXXFLAGS rather than our non-standard DEBUGFLAGS (whether DEBUGFLAGS should be 
propagated to LevelDB or not is another conversation I guess).

Luke

--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread grarpamp
 Linux builds of 0.8.0rc1 are in good shape; easily gitian-reproduceable.
 Windows builds are varying with every compile, and I think I finally
 The OSX build is in pretty good shape, but needs
 So: I think the path forward is to announce 0.8.0rc1 with the binaries
 we've got, to get more testing.

With this new minor bump, I'd like to encourage the project to perform
a build check on FreeBSD 8.3 (gcc), and 9.1 (should be clang/llvm).
I'll try to get to 8.x but may not be able to in time.

--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.0rc1 status

2013-02-08 Thread Pieter Wuille
On 9 Feb 2013 00:50, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com wrote:
 Then before final release (or rc2, if that is needed) pull #2286 and
 create and pull a patch to fix the windows non-determinism problem.

#2243 should fix that, I think.

-- 
Pieter
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development