I don't understand why you say my proposal would make the protocol more
stateful. I think it doesn't.
Each reply is only the result of the current request only, and there is
no new session information.
I also wondered this. My first thought was that it's basically the same as
the PING
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt sirk...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
based on what was done for the checksum field)
That seems like a
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41:05AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt sirk...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
, 2012 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Adding request/reply id in messages
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41:05AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt sirk...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt sirk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
based on what was done for the checksum field)
The original
: [Bitcoin-development] Adding request/reply id in messages
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt sirk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
based
be better if there was no state whatsoever.
From: Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com
To: sirk...@gmail.com
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Adding request/reply id in messages
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jeff elaborated the problems very well, but I just want to add this:
Your change is essentially relying (trusting) the server to track a piece
of information (your state).
No, it is more about distinguishing between
Hi,
I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
based on what was done for the checksum field)
The original reason is that I found it very hard to implement robust
blockchain downloading as
9 matches
Mail list logo
