Does it make sense to implement a generic Policy interface (abstract
class) which StandardPolicy extends?
Maybe you can then implement a WhitelistPolicy,
ReplacebyFeeStandardPolicy, ReplacebyFeeWhitelistPolicy...
This would make it simpler for miners to implement their own policies
in general.
This one looks entirely useless (it cannot be made secure), and the assertion
that it is necessary for atomic cross-chain transfers seems unfounded and
probably wrong...
Luke
On Friday, April 25, 2014 6:49:37 PM Tier Nolan wrote:
As part of the atomic cross chain system, outputs need to be
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
This one looks entirely useless (it cannot be made secure)
The hash locking isn't to prevent someone else stealing your coin. Once a
user broadcasts a transaction with x in it, then everyone has access to x.
It is to release the
It is also useful for betting: an oracle will associate a hash with each
possible outcome, and when outcome is know, it will reveal a corresponding
preimage which will unlock the transaction.
This approach has several advantages over approach with multi-sig script:
1. oracle doesn't need to be
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:06:37PM +0300, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
It is also useful for betting: an oracle will associate a hash with each
possible outcome, and when outcome is know, it will reveal a corresponding
preimage which will unlock the transaction.
This approach has several advantages
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Actually I did some work looking at this problem a few months ago and
other than somewhat larger transactions it looks like implementing
oracles by having the oracle reveal ECC secret keys works better in
every case. Notably
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:19:48PM -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Actually I did some work looking at this problem a few months ago and
other than somewhat larger transactions it looks like implementing
oracles by having
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Along those lines, rather than doing up yet another format specific type
as Tier Nolan is doing with his BIP, why not write a BIP looking at how
the IsStandard() rules could be removed?
Removal of isStandard() would be
8 matches
Mail list logo
