Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dust recycling

2014-03-29 Thread Justus Ranvier
On 03/29/2014 07:55 PM, Goss, Brian C., M.D. wrote: Could you collect the dust into a transaction with no outputs (thus making it all tx fees) or putting in to an anyone can spend tx? The large number of signatures (for large n) would make the tx size large...but, if enough dust were out

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dust recycling

2014-03-29 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Justus Ranvier justusranv...@gmail.com wrote: What would make it easier is if there was a standard output type for sending the entire transaction to miner fees, Hm. maybe it could be called a return operator or something like that? :) that would make even

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dust recycling

2014-03-29 Thread Justus Ranvier
On 03/29/2014 08:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Use dust-b-gone and make it someone elses problem to get it relayed. :) That's a sub-optimal solution, as it introduces a third party. What if his server goes down? An universal solution is preferable. -- Support online privacy by using email

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dust recycling

2014-03-29 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Justus Ranvier justusranv...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/29/2014 08:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Use dust-b-gone and make it someone elses problem to get it relayed. :) That's a sub-optimal solution, as it introduces a third party. What if his server goes down? An