Re: [Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not?

On Saturday, March 03, 2012 8:44:45 AM Stefan Thomas wrote: > I have some comments on the content of the BIP, but since this thread is > more of a meta-discussion I'll wait until the BIP is officially proposed. Please do comment on the content, in the original thread if you prefer: Message-Id: <2

Re: [Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not?

Since several independent clients (I know at least libcoin and BitcoinJS ) aim to implement JSON-RPC APIs which are either a superset of the origi

Re: [Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not?

On Friday, March 02, 2012 1:51:41 PM Amir Taaki wrote: > It is a implementation-specific non-bitcoin-protocol proposal. My > understanding of BIPs is that they apply across bitcoin implementations > and largely focus on the most generic use-cases (like the URIs) and the > protocol. Things which aff

[Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not?

Hi, I got sent this BIP: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_DRAFT:_getmemorypool#JSON-RPC_Method:_getmemorypool What is your opinion on this? Is it BIP related? It is a implementation-specific non-bitcoin-protocol proposal. My understanding of BIPs is that they apply across bitcoin implementation