I believe that the Payment Protocol works that way, the merchant broadcast
the Tx.
El 10/06/2014 13:23, Chris D'Costa chrisjdco...@gmail.com escribió:
I wonder if Raul is mistakenly under the impression that the transaction
only reaches the Bitcoin network via Alice? In which case the premise
I dont know if this attack is even possible, it came to my mind and I will
try to explain it as good as possible.
Some transacions keep unconfirmed forever and finally they are purged by
Bitcoin nodes, mostly due to the lack of fees.
Example:
-
Alice is selling a pizza to Bob, Bob is
From what I know, Alice does not know to which node Bob will broadcast the
transaction. Therefore, Alice cannot intercept the transaction and prevent
the rest of the network from seeing it.
Toshi
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Raúl Martínez r...@i-rme.es wrote:
I dont know if this attack is
Alice does not intercept the transaction, she only saves it and expect that
it will not be confirmed (because has 0 fee for example).
Also using the Payment Protocol I believe that Alice is the only person
that can relay Bob's transaction.
Source:
Whenever you do a reissuing of a transaction that didn't go through
earlier, you should make sure to reuse one of the inputs for it. That
guarantees that both cannot confirm simultaneously.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Raúl Martínez r...@i-rme.es wrote:
Alice does not intercept the
5 matches
Mail list logo