On 02/03/2015 04:04 AM, Will wrote:
> An idea for the bitcoin malware proposal below, the idea is at the bottom…
> ...
> The trick we need to look at is how to use the bitcoin network as a
> delivery mechanism to bypass the need for the trusted third party in the
> example above.
Using the Bitcoi
to catch on and become cost
competitive. I think the key is making it invisible to the user.
From: Adam Weiss
Reply: Adam Weiss >
Date: February 3, 2015 at 12:25:20 PM
To: Will >
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Subject: Re: Proposal t
>
> TREZOR like devices with BIP70 support and third party cosigning services
> are a solution I really like the sound of. I suppose though that adding
> BIP70 request signature validation and adding certificate revocation
> support starts to balloon the scope of what is supposed to be a very simp
> Regardless, I think a standard for passing partially signed transactions
> around might make sense (maybe a future extension to BIP70), with attention
> to both PC <-> small hardware devices and pushing stuff around on the
> Internet. It would be great if users had a choice of hardware signi
>
>
> Using a desktop website and mobile device for 2/3 multisig in lieu of a
> hardware device (trezor) and desktop website (mytrezor) works, but the key
> is that the device used to input the two signatures cannot be in the same
> band. What you are protecting against are MITM attacks. The issu
An idea for the bitcoin malware proposal below, the idea is at the bottom…
Using a desktop website and mobile device for 2/3 multisig in lieu of a
hardware device (trezor) and desktop website (mytrezor) works, but the key is
that the device used to input the two signatures cannot be in the same
6 matches
Mail list logo
