On 10/22/2014 10:46 AM, Chris D'Costa wrote:
Looks great, but how would you resolve the problem of knowing for certain
that the public key you have received to encrypt the message is not from a
MITM?
Isn't this the same problem with PGP?
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak
On 09/23/2014 11:12 PM, Mem Wallet wrote:
- M,Sender_Address = ReceiveMessage( eM, Decrypting_Key ) It is
acceptable for deterministic nonces to be used for signatures, however
nonces generated for ECIES must be high quality random bytes. (excepting
unit test vectors)
Could you
On 09/23/2014 11:12 PM, Mem Wallet wrote:
communication. To address gmaxwell's criticism, I'd like to also
follow up with a proposed change to BIP44, such that a structured
wallet would also include a series of identity keys, both addresses
which will be used for signing, and public keys which
Hello,
I've made a proposal for a standardized ecies scheme for bitcoin
communication. To address gmaxwell's criticism, I'd like to also
follow up with a proposed change to BIP44, such that a structured
wallet would also include a series of identity keys, both addresses
which will be used for
4 matches
Mail list logo
