Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisignature transaction support in the GUI

2012-02-07 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote: Change BitcoinAddressValidator::MaxAddressLength to 35 The addresses are validated with walletmodel-validateAddress which in turn calls CBitcoinAddress addressParsed(addr) and then isValid(). Does this work for the new addresses?

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.6 release candidate 1 plan

2012-02-07 Thread Luke-Jr
On Monday, February 06, 2012 10:54:25 AM Luke-Jr wrote: 769 : Make transactions with extra data in scriptSig non-standard If this affects relaying, it will significantly harm the ability to replace the current spammy green address scheme with a sensible extra signature system. On the miner

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.6 release candidate 1 plan

2012-02-07 Thread Luke-Jr
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:04:36 AM Luke-Jr wrote: On Monday, February 06, 2012 10:54:25 AM Luke-Jr wrote: 769 : Make transactions with extra data in scriptSig non-standard If this affects relaying, it will significantly harm the ability to replace the current spammy green address

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.6 release candidate 1 plan

2012-02-07 Thread Gavin Andresen
Do you have an alternative solution to the problem of green addresses spamming the blockchain? Sure, here's one: Green address provider give a REST-ful API, that provides the following functionality: + Give transaction ID and credentials, request that the transaction be declared green

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Scaling at the end user level

2012-02-07 Thread grarpamp
I never did track down this exact issue but it's an artificial slowdown.. meaning compression and whatever else wouldn't help much. I meant for anyone who wanted to distribute the dataset as a project. It has something to do with the database file locking and flushing.. on some systems I've