On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:01:08AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:03:54AM +0100, Timo Hanke wrote:
First, we have drafted a quite general specification for bitcoin
certificates (protobuf messages) that allow for a variety of payment
protocols (e.g. static as well as
On Saturday, February 09, 2013 2:33:25 PM Timo Hanke wrote:
Why don't you use namecoin or another alt-chain for this?
Because namcoin tries to solve a different problem, DNS, whereas I want
to establish an identity for a payment protocol.
What is the technical difference here? Namecoin ties
2 matches
Mail list logo