That is true, but someone is already running it as a service on the blockchain
itself. See:
https://www.proofofexistence.com/
You can imagine similar services cropping up for things like torrents, sending
btc tweets, etc. While I am not saying these things are particularly refined
ideas in an
On 11 June 2013 17:29, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:11:33 PM Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > For the sake of argument let's say that opaque means that you can tell
> > nothing about the address by examining the characters.
>
> This is true or false based on CONTEXT.
>
> Obviously, an i
On 19 May 2013 15:23, Adam Back wrote:
> Is there a way to experiment with new features - eg committed coins - that
> doesnt involve an altcoin in the conventional sense, and also doesnt impose
> a big testing burden on bitcoin main which is a security and testing risk?
>
> eg lets say some form
Why use ripple and not just use the testnet?
The advantageous of allowing testnet to be used as an alt-coin are That Non
standard transactions can be tested in a pseudo live environment where because
the coins have some nominal value people are incentivized to try and steal and
come up with cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:25:05PM -0400, Alan Reiner wrote:
>> to sign votes. Not only that, but it would require them to reveal their
>> public key, which while isn't technically so terrible, l
5 matches
Mail list logo
