Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop client on bitcoin.org

2013-06-30 Thread Peter Todd
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:09:16AM +, John Dillon wrote: > true transaction origins. Which reminds me, again, we need node-to-node > connections to be encrypted to at least protect against network-wide > passive sniffiing. Agreed. Speaking of, I may have missed it but as far as I can tell Bit

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop client on bitcoin.org

2013-06-30 Thread Mike Hearn
Sounds like we have consensus, Saivann, shall we do it? I'm also going to ask Theymos again to relax the newbie restrictions for the alt client forums. It's probably too hard to get support at the moment and "email jim" doesn't scale at all. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop client on bitcoin.org

2013-06-30 Thread Jim
Yeah "email jim' was never going to work so I have bumped up MultiBit support (a bit) by: + having a dedicated Support page on the website https://multibit.org/support.html It has fixes and support notes for the most common gotchas. + the in-app help also now has a 'Support' section with

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop client on bitcoin.org

2013-06-30 Thread Gary Rowe
I've beefed up the supporting documentation for the website to make it more accessible for developers who wish to contribute. It's a Java application serving HTML. It can be found here: https://github.com/jim618/multibit-website On 30 June 2013 16:19, Jim wrote: > Yeah "email jim' was never go