On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering if we shouldn't have a BIP32 addendum which makes the
following signing related recommendations:
Looks like we're in the midst of another DSA duplicated K disaster.
(Now, blockchain.info mywallet)
I
I think the confidence of the tx is not really the users concern anyway.
They wrote it so they know it's valid. If the merchant disagrees for some
reason then the user can find out, out of band when the goods/services are
not delivered.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Gavin Andresen
There have been a few not-quite-serious-enough-to-justify-a-release
security fixes that, along with a couple of serious bugs, we think together
DO justify a new 0.8.* release.
So I just created a 0.8.4 branch, based on the 0.8.3 branch, and will be
cherry-picking from the master branch.
Planned
Dear bitcoin developers,
trading arbitrary amounts of bitcoins makes it easier to trace who
does what just by observing the amounts being traded, and where the
residual money ends up: e.g. you can identify that obviously, the
recurrent user of address A sent 2.5 bitcoins to the recurrent user of
4 matches
Mail list logo
