First time posting to this mailing list so feel free to ignore me if
this is a stupid idea.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
We need to get away from the notion of senders attaching fees anyway. This is
the wrong
way around because it’s the recipient who
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
The payment protocol at least would need some notion of fee, or possibly
(better?) the ability for a recipient to specify some inputs as well as some
outputs.
vendor hat: on
BitPay noticed this detail last week. We were
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
PPv1 doesn't have any notion of fee unfortunately. I suppose it could be
added easily, but we also need to launch the existing feature set.
Lets bang out a merchant-pays-fee extension.
How about:
SPEC:
optional uint64
3 matches
Mail list logo
