Re: [Bitcoin-development] Floating fees and SPV clients

2013-12-04 Thread Peter Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote: I think this US/other cultural issue is complicating things more than we appreciate. I am trying to imagine in my head how all this will work and what it will look like with allow_fee, and I just can't see it.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Floating fees and SPV clients

2013-12-04 Thread Peter Todd
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:09:42PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: Please don't try and drag this thread off topic. What I said is factually correct. If you want to (again) try and convince people things should work differently, start another thread for that. replace-by-fee is no less speculative

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Floating fees and SPV clients

2013-12-04 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote: replace-by-fee is no less speculative than your original proposals; you're also trying to convince people that things should work differently re: fees The original proposal I started this thread with hasn't even received

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Floating fees and SPV clients

2013-12-04 Thread Peter Todd
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:48:08PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote: replace-by-fee is no less speculative than your original proposals; you're also trying to convince people that things should work differently re: fees The