I think that's fair, so long as we limit bitcoin-development discussion to
issues that are relevant to the owners of the hashrate and companies that
pay developer salaries.
What I'm asking for is some honesty that Bitcoin is a centralized system
and to stop arguing technical points on the altar of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/23/2014 03:12 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I find it more likely that fake PGP keys are from corporate
> industrial espionage and/or organized crime outfits. Intelligence
> agencies will stick to compromised X509, network cards, and binary
>
On 03/24/2014 01:34 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I'm here because I want to sell corn for bitcoin, and I believe it will be
> more profitable for me to do that with a bitcoin-blockchain-based system
> in which I have the capability to audit the code that executes the trade.
A discussion over such
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 8:47:02 AM Peter Todd wrote:
> To make a long story short, it was soon suggested that Bitcoin Core be
> forked - the software, not the protocol - and miners encouraged to
> support it.
There's been at least one public miner-oriented fork of Bitcoin Core since 0.7
or ea
4 matches
Mail list logo