I've put up some bitcoind nodes after the network is
in need of some, and would like some feedback in that
the nodes are fully operational and doing something
useful. Please check the logs and tell me whether
I'm doing good.
debug.log from a node that has been running for a day:
2014-04-29 08:06:
Looks good to me!
You're not in the DNS seeds yet. If you leave your nodes up for a while
then you'll start getting traffic from bitcoinj clients too.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> I've put up some bitcoind nodes after the network is
> in need of some, and would like s
I do think we need to move beyond this idea of Bitcoin being some kind of
elegant embodiment of natural mathematical law. It just ain't so.
Every time miners and nodes ignore a block that creates >formula() coins
that's a majority vote on a controversial political matter, as evidenced by
the disag
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> It only works if the majority of hashpower is controlled by attackers, in
> which case Bitcoin is already doomed. So it doesn't matter at that point.
These parties wouldn't generally consider themselves attackers— nor
would many users (presumab
>
> These parties wouldn't generally consider themselves attackers
>
Of course not, attackers rarely do :)
But they are miners who are taking part in malicious double spending. That
makes them attackers. If miners don't exist to stop double spending, what
do they exist for?
I mean, this is funda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We have BIP70 already in use (over a hundred paid requests).
Could you elaborate on why this needs changing?
On 28-04-14 14:39, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> There is a discussion about clarifying how BIP70 signs payment
> requests here: https://github.c
Consensus is the spec should be clarified to match current behavior, so it
won't change.
--
Gavin Andresen
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Jouke Hofman wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We have BIP70 already in use (over a hundred paid requests).
>
> Could you el
Let's try to get GBT 2.0 off the ground finally.. :)
Here's some wishlist items/ideas:
- Extremely low bandwidth use (binary protocol, with compression support)
- UDP-based transport protocol? (so message order need not be preserved at the
expense of latency)
- Ability to instruct miners to inse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2014 02:13 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I do think we need to move beyond this idea of Bitcoin being some
> kind of elegant embodiment of natural mathematical law. It just
> ain't so.
>
I think everybody understands that Bitcoin has a positive ne
9 matches
Mail list logo
