On 10/22/2014 10:46 AM, Chris D'Costa wrote:
Looks great, but how would you resolve the problem of knowing for certain
that the public key you have received to encrypt the message is not from a
MITM?
Isn't this the same problem with PGP?
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak
On 09/23/2014 11:12 PM, Mem Wallet wrote:
- M,Sender_Address = ReceiveMessage( eM, Decrypting_Key ) It is
acceptable for deterministic nonces to be used for signatures, however
nonces generated for ECIES must be high quality random bytes. (excepting
unit test vectors)
Could you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/20/2014 12:50 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
One thing this brings up is the never-resolved issue of whether
BIPs should document how we'd *like* things to work, or how things
*actually do* work. BIP32 is an example of the former - it was new
For those following this thread, we have now written a paper
describing the side-chains, 2-way pegs and compact SPV proofs.
(With additional authors Andrew Poelstra Andrew Miller).
http://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf
Adam
On 16 March 2014 15:58, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
So an
I've already added it here:
http://www.opencryptocurrencyreview.com/papers/123/enabling-blockchain-innovations-with-pegged-sidechains
I made this site to allow discussions on exactly these sorts of things
to be publicly visible and easily discoverable in the future (this is
why I replied to all).
Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've
been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this.
I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement
after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did
post on reddit a few
Take the discussion of this site to another M-L, please. It is off-topic.
Actual discussion of the paper and side-chains is on-topic.
This M-L is publicly archived.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Daniel Murrell dsmurr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this
7 matches
Mail list logo
