This breaks existing invariants and would make the coins potentially less
fungible because they wouldn't be reorg safe.
I'm not sure coins are ever reorg safe. All it takes is a double spend in
the history of your coins for them to become invalid after a reorg. Because
of that, there are already
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Flavien Charlon
flavien.char...@coinprism.com wrote:
This breaks existing invariants and would make the coins potentially less
fungible because they wouldn't be reorg safe.
I'm not sure coins are ever reorg safe. All it takes is a double spend in
the history
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Mem Wallet memwallet.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an intention that the various internal libraries could/should
be strengthened and heirachicalized such that they would be suitable for
3rd
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Oliver Egginger bitc...@olivere.de wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic but while reading this I like to ask you for
picocoin, see:
https://github.com/jgarzik/picocoin
For a research project I'm looking for a C library to operate some block
chain analysis
4 matches
Mail list logo
