Re: [Bitcoin-development] Relative CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY (was CLTV proposal)

2015-04-27 Thread Peter Todd
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 02:20:04PM +0200, Jorge Timón wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jorge Timón jti...@jtimon.cc wrote: And a new softfork rule could enforce that all new CTxIn set nHeight to the correct height in which its corresponding prevout got into the chain. That would

[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 released

2015-04-27 Thread Wladimir J. van der Laan
Bitcoin Core version 0.10.1 is now available from: https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/ The distribution is also available as torrent: https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.10.1/bitcoin-0.10.1.torrent

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment

2015-04-27 Thread Kalle Rosenbaum
Some more use cases might be: Waiting in comfort: - Send a payment ahead of time, then wander over and collect the goods after X confirmations. Authorized pickup : - Hot wallet software used by related people could facilitate the use of 1 of N multisig funds. Any one of the N wallets

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proof of Payment

2015-04-27 Thread Kalle Rosenbaum
Or a really high lock_time, but it would not make it invalid, just delayed. Ok, this was a bad idea, since nodes would have to keep it in memory. Please disregard that idea... Kalle Den 27 apr 2015 14:35 skrev Kalle Rosenbaum ka...@rosenbaum.se: Some more use cases might be: Waiting in

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes

2015-04-27 Thread Brian Deery
Hi Justus: CC'ing mailing list because more bloom filter and HD wallet experts there can chime in for some of these thoughts. I refined some ideas we went over earlier. Here are some critiques/worries about the payment codes. With identities explicitly tied to a payment code, bloom filter

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes

2015-04-27 Thread Mike Hearn
1. There will be a 1:1 relationship between a payment code owner and their identity. Bear in mind, the spec defines identity to mean: *Identity is a particular extended public/private key pair. * So that's not quite what is meant normally by identity. It's not a government / real name

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reusable payment codes

2015-04-27 Thread Justus Ranvier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/27/2015 04:46 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: So that's not quite what is meant normally by identity. It's not a government / real name identity or an email address or phone number kind of identity. I expect that mappings would begin to develop

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 75%/95% threshold for transaction versions

2015-04-27 Thread Peter Todd
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:32:36AM -0400, Stephen Morse wrote: Hi William, I personally prefer this solution, since it nails the problem completely with one simple and obvious change. The BIP 62 approach is more like a game of wac-a-mole. The two are complementary, not competing.