Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function

> Let the block size limit be a function of the number of current transactions in the mempool. There is no single mempool which transactions could be counted and there is no consensus about the average number of unconfirmed transactions. 2015-06-01 13:30 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Filipe : > I've been fo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork

> Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen do not own Bitcoin and, emphatically, you cannot have it. Neither do you or anyone else. > There is protocol for how change is effected in a FOSS project. And it allows the minority to hold the majority hostage. > If you take the risks with Mike&GavCoin, that wou

Re: [Bitcoin-development] improving development model (Re: Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers

> At the risk of stating cliches, the Mac came before the Windows PC…Yahoo! came before Google…MySpace came before Facebook… And TCP/IP came before... oh wait... 2015-06-19 14:02 GMT+02:00 Eric Lombrozo : > > On Jun 19, 2015, at 3:45 AM, Dr Adam Back wrote: > > That wont be good for the compani