[Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?

milar that I missed when cruising the mailing list archives on the subject. Thanks, – Matt Smith | Gem https://gem.co | GH: @thedoctor 0x63331857.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Descr

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?

ving to change it later) or overload 44 (which would be misleading). Did I either a) answer or b) misunderstand your questions? -- Matt Smith | Gem https://gem.co | GH: @thedoctor On 6/19/15 2:25 PM, Matt @ Envrin Group wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > I think your best bet is probably just push

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternate HD path structure: BIP, blog, or wat?

st a platform where updates can't be forced on clients. To be clear: I am not suggesting this as a general-purpose successor to BIP44. – Matt Smith | Gem https://gem.co | GH: @thedoctor On 6/19/15 5:57 PM, Andreas Petersson wrote: >> m/##'/0'/99'/0' >> >&g