I've got minna patches for nio based on bitcoinj. I've enumerated the
network a few times and am working on a DNS seed service as well as some
weather reports.
Happy to start a branch when the committers are ready.
-rick
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Steve shadders@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I was looking at the wiki entry for this and noticed that your
description of DNSSEC is incorrect. It is an internet standard and is
widely deployed in the root (.), many TLDs, ccTLDs and second leverl
domains.
Also understand when the IETF or ICANN adopts new (we worked on DNSSEC
no less than 10
understand that not *everyone* wants or will adhere to that best
practice and in my NSHO it isn't.
-rick
2011/12/14 Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:02:25 PM Rick Wesson wrote:
I also am largely in favor of using secured zones to publish TXT
records to digital
Why don't just...
bitcoin://url.without.explicitly.specifying.provider
bitcoin://alias@provider
bitcoin://IIBAN@authorizedBitcoinInstitution ??
By the way, I don't like the fact that a single authorized institution
needs to map the IIBANs to bitcoin addresses.
The IANA is a good
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Andy Parkins andypark...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You've been unfair, the equivalent of your u...@authority.tld is
https://authority.tld/user; or https://user.authority.tld/; or
https://google.com/bitcoin/user; or any of an infinite number of other
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Khalahan k...@dot-bit.org wrote:
The number of proposals is not infinite, here are their problems :
- FirstBits : centralized
- DNS TXT Records : DNSSEC is required to have a minimum of security, limits
usage to engineers, limits usage to some domain names (i
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Walter Stanish wal...@stani.sh wrote:
X-ISO4217-A3
I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there
a reason for this?
Of the three currently published proposals, all are essentially IANA
registry proposals.
We are currently working
I prefer to leverage the signing of the (.) root in the DNS tree. The
amount of effort in signing the root holds more weight than building a CA
off the bitcoin blockchain.
If you want to associate identifiers for payment addresses I suggest
putting those in DNSSEC signed records in the DNS.
For
I'd raised this topic before suggesting to leverage DNS as its kinda useful
for mapping names to numbers.
Expect no support.
-rick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Chris Evans aaxiomfin...@gmail.com wrote:
wonder if it would be good idea to have a alias to wallet id nameserver in
the client
+1
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Ryan Carboni ryan.jc...@gmail.comwrote:
The exchanges that are kept track of could be hard coded into Bitcoin or
the miner could choose, how this works is not something I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
