Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-05-23 Thread Eric Lombrozo
A few months back, William Swanson and I had worked on a more general script template format. Unfortunately, other work has prevented us from being able to fully complete it - but here’s the start: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nGF6LjGwhzuiJ9AQwKAhN1a1SXvGGHWxoKmDSkiIsPI

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-05-22 Thread Thomas Kerin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I wonder are there any other blockers or modifications that need to be made for this to be merged? Latest version of the document: https://github.com/afk11/bips/blob/213e8a27a3a2eaaf44f79221a9f9f888af002801/bip-0067.mediawiki On 13/02/15 23:43,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-13 Thread Ruben de Vries
The idea is more like BIP44/45 to have a 'standard' that software can comply by and express they do so that it makes a step towards compatibility between (wallet) software. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:13:33PM +, Luke

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-13 Thread Thomas Kerin
On 12/02/15 22:13, Luke Dashjr wrote: Where is the Specification section?? Does this support arbitrary scripts, or only the simplest CHECKMULTISIG case? The BIP is a process for deriving only the type of scripts you would encounter doing addmultisigaddress. More complicated scripts would

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-12 Thread Luke Dashjr
Where is the Specification section?? Does this support arbitrary scripts, or only the simplest CHECKMULTISIG case? On Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:42:23 PM Thomas Kerin wrote: Hi all, I have drafted a BIP with Jean Pierre and Ruben after the last discussion, related to a standard for

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-12 Thread Peter Todd
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:13:33PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: Where is the Specification section?? Does this support arbitrary scripts, or only the simplest CHECKMULTISIG case? It might be enough to rewrite this BIP to basically say all pubkeys executed by all CHECKMULTISIG opcodes will be in