Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit

2014-06-06 Thread Peter Todd
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Adam Back wrote: Advertising NODE BLOOM as a service sounds good. But the critique of bloom filters, I am not so sure prefix filters are better. Prefix filters offer questionable privacy tradeoffs in my opinion. Same problem as with stealth address

Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit

2014-06-06 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote: Advertising NODE BLOOM as a service sounds good. But the critique of bloom filters, I am not so sure prefix filters are better. Prefix filters offer questionable privacy tradeoffs in my opinion. Same problem as with

Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit

2014-06-06 Thread Peter Todd
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:03:29AM -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote: Advertising NODE BLOOM as a service sounds good. But the critique of bloom filters, I am not so sure prefix filters are better. Prefix filters offer