Hi Martin,
You're on the right lines. Your writeup is pretty similar to the high level
overview given here though:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_2:_Escrow_and_dispute_mediation
To make 2-of-3 dispute mediation works requires implementing a wallet that
supports it, and the tools
I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
feedback from community.
IMO it's better to pair a protocol spec with an implementation. For one, it
can show up issues in the design you didn't think of. For another,
implementation is a lot more work than speccing out a
I know about that wiki page. I just wanted to design protocol which
would make it easier in practice. (now it would be done manually)
I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
feedback from community.
2015-01-31 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net:
Hi Martin,
I agree- standards should be descriptive (here is how this thing I did
works) and NOT proscriptive (here's what I think will work, lets all try
to do it this way.).
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to
I didn't consider that, thank you for feedback! I will try to find
some time for implementing it. I'll write again then.
2015-01-31 23:50 GMT+02:00 Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com:
I agree- standards should be descriptive (here is how this thing I did
works) and NOT proscriptive (here's
Ooh, I had a very similar proposal, except it involved sharing generic P2SH
scripts. It also involved facilitating requesting of signatures.. We should
talk.On 31 Jan 2015 01:30, Martin Habovštiak martin.habovst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I've been thinking about how to solve security
6 matches
Mail list logo