On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Thanks for presenting your solution as code in any case. It really is a useful
> way to communicate and I wish more people did that.
+1
--
Dive into the World of P
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Ross Nicoll wrote:
> Ah, thanks for that.
>
> I'll try Peter's patch for testnet tomorrow, sounds like it should fix
> this for my use case.
Thanks for presenting your solution as code in any case. In spite of
the fact that I gave it a crappy read this time, it rea
On 04/01/15 17:44, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> Can you send me the actual raw transaction (that site doesn't appear
>> have a way to get it, only some cooked json output; which doesn't
>> include the sequence number).
>
> Nevermind, I guess.
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 05:44:59PM +, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > Can you send me the actual raw transaction (that site doesn't appear
> > have a way to get it, only some cooked json output; which doesn't
> > include the sequence number).
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Can you send me the actual raw transaction (that site doesn't appear
> have a way to get it, only some cooked json output; which doesn't
> include the sequence number).
Nevermind, I guess. I think I figured out your problem: The behaviour
o
On 04/01/15 17:35, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Ross Nicoll wrote:
>> Grabbing a simple test case:
>> https://chain.so/tx/BTCTEST/f903a31f2474df737d324c60abf2407e1cf7e052844da4ccffbfab81cf6ac1f8
>> - that won't lock until 0028 UTC on the 5th.
>>
>> I've tried closing th
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Ross Nicoll wrote:
> Grabbing a simple test case:
> https://chain.so/tx/BTCTEST/f903a31f2474df737d324c60abf2407e1cf7e052844da4ccffbfab81cf6ac1f8
> - that won't lock until 0028 UTC on the 5th.
>
> I've tried closing the wallet, moving the wallet.dat file out of the
>
On 04/01/15 17:04, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ross Nicoll wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I've been looking at atomic cross-chain trading (
>> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Atomic_cross-chain_trading ) between the
>> Bitcoin and Dogecoin blockchains, and have a mostly function
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ross Nicoll wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've been looking at atomic cross-chain trading (
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Atomic_cross-chain_trading ) between the
> Bitcoin and Dogecoin blockchains, and have a mostly functional
> prototype. However as it stands if the refun
9 matches
Mail list logo
