Re: raw-dump file

2017-06-27 Thread Stefano Pieri
EDIT: "how should I match the things to get xprv?" OK I got it... I just composed the HEX 'index+chain code+secret key' and then convert to base58. now I've got all the xpriv of all the M/0h , M/0h/0 , M/0h/1... unfortunately when I try to re-build the chain the only correct address is the

Re: Bitcoinj support for SegWit / NYA?

2017-06-27 Thread Andreas Schildbach
The list entry is correct -- it's still wip. Plus, neither nya nor segwit should change anything for the existing users if the forks go well (in the sense that they don't split the network). On 06/27/2017 04:46 AM, 'Miles Suter' via bitcoinj wrote: > Hi Andreas - is bitcoinj fully prepared for

Re: How to Start Debugging the start up of the Bitcoin Service in Java?

2017-06-27 Thread Raj Krishnan V
Hi there, I am new to both Java and Bitcoin, can you please help me to start working with Bitcoinj from Eclipse IDE. I am getting "Error: Could not find or load main class " when I run the ForwardingService class. On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 7:58:28 PM UTC+5:30, BitCoinX3 wrote: > > Hi All, > I

Re: raw-dump file

2017-06-27 Thread Stefano Pieri
yes, I agree that the code I attached seems to be the 0/1, but the converted readable key of secret bytes "\247\031\222\016\377\..blabla/" is a 64 char string "a719920effc3ec46e47871ae9f55d77c" and not xprv... how should I match

Re: How to Start Debugging the start up of the Bitcoin Service in Java?

2017-06-27 Thread Kunal Ransing
Hi, If its maven project then make sure you added bitcoinj dependency like below: org.bitcoinj bitcoinj-core 0.14.4 compile If its simple java program then make sure to add required jars in classpath(For Eclipse : Project->Properties->Java Build

Re: Bitcoinj support for SegWit / NYA?

2017-06-27 Thread 'Miles Suter' via bitcoinj
So if NYA goes into effect bitcoinj based applications will not be able to take advantage of the 75% discount provided by Segwit transactions? On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 10:25:43 AM UTC-7, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > > The list entry is correct -- it's still wip. Plus, neither nya nor >