Re: ./lib/libbt.pc.in should be modified if using -liconv

2004-09-20 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Friday 17 September 2004 23:13, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Bradley T Hughes wrote: > > Indeed... I made this change a few days ago in CVS ;) > > Awesome! > > Are there nightly tarballs? (If I recall sourceforge can provide > daily tarballs.) There were, until sourceforge disa

Re: ./lib/libbt.pc.in should be modified if using -liconv

2004-09-17 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Bradley T Hughes wrote: > Indeed... I made this change a few days ago in CVS ;) Awesome! Are there nightly tarballs? (If I recall sourceforge can provide daily tarballs.) Or it would be nice to have a single daily diff against some release. (For you NetBSD or pkgsrc users

Re: ./lib/libbt.pc.in should be modified if using -liconv

2004-09-16 Thread Bradley T Hughes
On Thursday 16 September 2004 22:41, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > If libiconv is required, then I think ./lib/libbt.pc.in should be > modified on the Libs: line to add a -liconv link. > > This was noticed under NetBSD and FreeBSD (both using pkgsrc) to > build bbkeys. Once I manually added the -liconv t

./lib/libbt.pc.in should be modified if using -liconv

2004-09-16 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
If libiconv is required, then I think ./lib/libbt.pc.in should be modified on the Libs: line to add a -liconv link. This was noticed under NetBSD and FreeBSD (both using pkgsrc) to build bbkeys. Once I manually added the -liconv to the installed pkgconfig/libbt.pc Libs: all was well. Jeremy C.